The Unconvincing Case for 25%

28 Pages Posted: 26 Oct 2017  

Graeme S. Cooper

The University of Sydney Law School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: October 25, 2017

Abstract

This paper examines several elements of the case currently being advanced for reducing Australia’s corporate tax rate to 25%. In essence, the proposal is for an immediate, certain and widely-dispersed revenue loss wagered in the hope of triggering a contingent and deferred response from a narrow target. The paper revisits the history of this proposal and the development of the argument in the last two decades. It then queries some impressions embedded in the current debate – that the proposal is for a tax cut, that a 30% rate on commercial profit is actually paid (or meant to be paid) by most companies, that the imputation system will negate much of the cost of the lost revenue and that most foreign investors will benefit from a reduced corporate rate. The paper concludes that, while the proposal may be sensible for other reasons, the case currently being made is unconvincing.

Keywords: Corporate Tax, Corporate Rate, Tax Cuts, Imputation

JEL Classification: H25, H29, K10, K30, K34

Suggested Citation

Cooper, Graeme S., The Unconvincing Case for 25% (October 25, 2017). Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 17/90. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3059257 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3059257

Graeme S. Cooper (Contact Author)

The University of Sydney Law School ( email )

New Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
34
Abstract Views
152
PlumX