Secondary Towns and Poverty Reduction: Refocusing the Urbanization Agenda

Posted: 27 Oct 2017

See all articles by Luc Christiaensen

Luc Christiaensen

World Bank

Ravi Kanbur

Cornell University; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); IZA Institute of Labor Economics

Multiple version iconThere are 4 versions of this paper

Date Written: October 2017

Abstract

This review is framed around the exploration of a central hypothesis: A shift in public investment toward secondary towns from big cities will improve poverty reduction performance. Of course, the hypothesis raises many questions. What exactly is the dichotomy of secondary towns versus big cities? What is the evidence for the contribution of secondary towns versus cities to poverty reduction? What are the economic mechanisms for such a differential contribution, and how does policy interact with them? We find preliminary evidence and arguments in support of our hypothesis, but the impacts of policy on poverty are quite complex, even in simple settings. The question of whether a shift in investment to secondary towns reduces poverty more is an open area for research and policy analysis.

Suggested Citation

Christiaensen, Luc and Kanbur, Ravi, Secondary Towns and Poverty Reduction: Refocusing the Urbanization Agenda (October 2017). Annual Review of Resource Economics, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 405-419, 2017. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3060469 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053453

Luc Christiaensen (Contact Author)

World Bank ( email )

1818 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20433
United States

Ravi Kanbur

Cornell University ( email )

301-J Warren Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-7966 (Phone)
607-255-9984 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.kanbur.dyson.cornell.edu

Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

London
United Kingdom

IZA Institute of Labor Economics

P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
80
PlumX Metrics