Why the Two-Way Fixed Effects Model Is Difficult to Interpret, and What to Do About It
Kropko J, Kubinec R (2020) Interpretation and identification of within-unit and cross-sectional variation in panel data models. PLoS ONE 15(4): e0231349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231349
25 Pages Posted: 1 Nov 2017 Last revised: 22 Apr 2020
Date Written: May 14, 2018
The two-way fixed effects (FE) model, an increasingly popular method for modeling time-series cross-section (TSCS) data, is substantively difficult to interpret because the model's estimates are a complex amalgamation of variation in the over-time and cross-sectional effects. We demonstrate this complexity in the two-way FE estimate through mathematical exposition. As an illustration, we develop a novel simulation that enables us to generate TSCS data with varying over-time and cross-sectional effects and examine the behavior of the two-way FE model as these effects change. We demonstrate that the two-way FE model makes specific assumptions about TSCS datasets, and if these assumptions are not met, the model may be unidentified even if substantial variation exists along both dimensions. Because of the difficulty in interpretation, we do not recommend that applied researchers rely on the two-way FE model except for situations in which the assumptions are well-understood, such as the canonical difference-in-difference design.
Keywords: time series cross section, TSCS, political methodology, panel data
JEL Classification: C23
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation