Juvenile Murderers and 'National Consensus'

6 Pages Posted: 1 Nov 2017

Date Written: October 31, 2017

Abstract

The United States Supreme Court has made a number of important rulings in the past decade concerning how juveniles are punished for serious offenses. In 2005, the Court held that sentencing juvenile offenders to death is unconstitutional. In 2010, it held that sentencing juveniles convicted of non-homicide offenses to life in prison without parole (LWOP) is unconstitutional. In 2012, the Court held that mandatory LWOP sentences for juvenile murderers is unconstitutional, and just this past year it held that this latter ruling applies retroactively to previously-sentenced juveniles. Notably, the Court left open the question of whether non-mandatory LWOP for juvenile murderers is an acceptable punishment. This issue could be considered by the Court in the near future.

JEL Classification: Law and Psychology

Suggested Citation

Scurich, Nicholas, Juvenile Murderers and 'National Consensus' (October 31, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3062865 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3062865

Nicholas Scurich (Contact Author)

University of California, Irvine ( email )

Campus Drive
Irvine, CA 62697-3125
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
47
Abstract Views
208
PlumX Metrics