ASIC Enforcement Outcomes: Trends and Analysis

Company and Securities Law Journal, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 289-321, 2017

U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 758

40 Pages Posted: 1 Nov 2017 Last revised: 2 Mar 2018

See all articles by Ian Ramsay

Ian Ramsay

Melbourne Law School - University of Melbourne

Miranda Webster

University of Melbourne - Law School

Date Written: October 31, 2017

Abstract

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) views enforcement as an important part of its regulatory role and dedicates a significant amount of resources to surveillance and enforcement activity. This article considers what kinds of enforcement outcomes ASIC achieves and what these outcomes tell us about the way ASIC uses its enforcement resources. The authors analyse ASIC’s enforcement outcomes for the five-year period from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2016. This analysis shows that many of ASIC’s enforcement outcomes are criminal outcomes (nearly 70 percent), but this is due to the high number of criminal outcomes obtained by ASIC’s small business compliance and deterrence team — the other regulatory areas (market integrity, corporate governance and financial services) have a greater focus on administrative outcomes. There are clear differences between each of ASIC’s four main regulatory areas in the use of enforcement methods (criminal, civil, administrative remedies, enforceable undertakings/negotiated outcomes and public warning notices). There are also notable differences in the number of enforcement outcomes obtained by these four enforcement teams. For example, in the area of market integrity, which includes insider trading, there is a strong emphasis on criminal outcomes. However, in the area of financial services, there is a strong emphasis on administrative outcomes. These differences are influenced by particular enforcement approaches that ASIC takes towards certain kinds of misconduct.

Keywords: enforcement, corporate law, Australian Securities and Investments Commission

Suggested Citation

Ramsay, Ian and Webster, Miranda, ASIC Enforcement Outcomes: Trends and Analysis (October 31, 2017). Company and Securities Law Journal, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 289-321, 2017; U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 758. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3063002

Ian Ramsay (Contact Author)

Melbourne Law School - University of Melbourne ( email )

University Square
185 Pelham Street, Carlton
Victoria, Victoria 3010
Australia
+61 3 8344 5332 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://law.unimelb.edu.au/about/staff/ian-ramsay

Miranda Webster

University of Melbourne - Law School ( email )

University Square
185 Pelham Street, Carlton
Victoria, Victoria 3010
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
418
rank
65,411
Abstract Views
1,204
PlumX Metrics