Randomized Controlled Trials: How Can We Know 'What Works'?

Critical Review 29(3) (Forthcoming)

39 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2017  

Nick Cowen

New York University School of Law

Baljinder Virk

Unaffiliated Authors - Independent

Stella Mascarenhas-Keyes

Unaffiliated Authors - Independent

Nancy Cartwright

Durham University

Date Written: November 1, 2017

Abstract

We attempt to map the limits of evidence-based policy through an interactive theoretical critique and empirical case-study. We outline the emergence of an experimental turn in EBP among British policymakers and the limited, broadly inductive, epistemic approach that underlies it. We see whether and how field professionals identify and react to these limitations through a case study of teaching professionals subject to a push to integrate research evidence into their practice. Results suggest that many of the challenges of establishing evidential warrant that EBP is supposed to streamline re-appear at the level of choice of locally effective policies and implementation.

Keywords: Behavioral Economics; Evidence-Based Policy; Meta-Analysis; Nudge; Nudging; Systematic Review; Education Policy

JEL Classification: D91; D80; C90

Suggested Citation

Cowen, Nick and Virk, Baljinder and Mascarenhas-Keyes, Stella and Cartwright, Nancy, Randomized Controlled Trials: How Can We Know 'What Works'? (November 1, 2017). Critical Review 29(3) (Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3063541

Nick Cowen (Contact Author)

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.nyu.edu/

Baljinder Virk

Unaffiliated Authors - Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Stella Mascarenhas-Keyes

Unaffiliated Authors - Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Nancy Cartwright

Durham University

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
114
rank
218,833
Abstract Views
554
PlumX