Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Randomized Controlled Trials: How Can We Know 'What Works'?

Critical Review 29(3) (Forthcoming)

39 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2017  

Nick Cowen

New York University School of Law

Baljinder Virk

Independent

Stella Mascarenhas-Keyes

Independent

Nancy Cartwright

Durham University

Date Written: November 1, 2017

Abstract

We attempt to map the limits of evidence-based policy through an interactive theoretical critique and empirical case-study. We outline the emergence of an experimental turn in EBP among British policymakers and the limited, broadly inductive, epistemic approach that underlies it. We see whether and how field professionals identify and react to these limitations through a case study of teaching professionals subject to a push to integrate research evidence into their practice. Results suggest that many of the challenges of establishing evidential warrant that EBP is supposed to streamline re-appear at the level of choice of locally effective policies and implementation.

Keywords: Behavioral Economics; Evidence-Based Policy; Meta-Analysis; Nudge; Nudging; Systematic Review; Education Policy

JEL Classification: D91; D80; C90

Suggested Citation

Cowen, Nick and Virk, Baljinder and Mascarenhas-Keyes, Stella and Cartwright, Nancy, Randomized Controlled Trials: How Can We Know 'What Works'? (November 1, 2017). Critical Review 29(3) (Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3063541

Nick Cowen (Contact Author)

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.nyu.edu/

Baljinder Virk

Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Stella Mascarenhas-Keyes

Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Nancy Cartwright

Durham University

Paper statistics

Downloads
109
Rank
218,022
Abstract Views
446