Trolls, Nuisance Suits, and the FTC

20 Pages Posted: 4 Nov 2017

Date Written: November 2, 2017

Abstract

The FTC’s Patent Assertion Entity Activity Report includes a path-breaking collection of data. Because of the FTC’s ability to force businesses and individuals to provide information, a power that no ordinary researcher possesses, the FTC has amassed a data set that can potentially be of great value. For example, the Report’s description of litigation PAEs and portfolio PAEs structure and behavior is, although not entirely new, very instructive. Unfortunately, the FTC made analytical errors that precludes using its work to directly support policy prescriptions. First, the FTC claims that if a suit settles for less than $300,000 then the suit was likely Negative Expected Value. In addition, the FTC claims that Negative Expected Value suits are bad. These claims are false. Second, the FTC’s policy recommendations have no connection to any of its factual analysis. And so, in terms of providing normative guidance, the Report is a failure.

Keywords: Nuisance Suits, Federal Trade Commission, Patent Assertion Entities, Patent Trolls, Patent Policy

JEL Classification: K10, K23, K41, L86, O34

Suggested Citation

Spitzer, Matthew L., Trolls, Nuisance Suits, and the FTC (November 2, 2017). Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper No. 17-14. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3064104 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3064104

Matthew L. Spitzer (Contact Author)

Northwestern University School of Law ( email )

375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-503-8434 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
54
Abstract Views
557
rank
375,065
PlumX Metrics