Separation of Powers Metatheory

55 Pages Posted: 6 Nov 2017 Last revised: 13 Dec 2017

Aziz Z. Huq

University of Chicago - Law School

Date Written: November 2, 2017

Abstract

Scholarship and jurisprudence concerning the Constitution’s separation of powers today is characterized by sharp disagreement about general theory and specific outcomes. The leading theories diverge on how to model the motives of institutional actors; on how to weigh text, history, doctrine, and norms; and on whether to characterize the separation-of-powers system as abiding in a stable equilibrium or as enthralled in convulsively transformative paroxysms. Congress’s Constitution — a major contribution to theorizing on the separation of powers — provides a platform to step back and isolate these important, if not always candidly recognized, disputes about the empirical and normative predicates of separation-of-powers theory — predicates that can be usefully grouped under the rubric of ‘separation of powers metatheory.’ Unlike much other work in the field, Congress’s Constitution directly identifies and addresses the three important key metatheoretical questions in play when the separation of powers is theorized. This review analyzes how it grapples with those profound challenges, and tries to articulate a descriptively fit and normatively compelling account of our federal government. Considering Congress’s Constitution from this perspective offers a valuable opportunity for considering the state and direction of academic theorizing on the separation of powers more broadly.

Keywords: Separation of powers; executive power; Congress

Suggested Citation

Huq, Aziz Z., Separation of Powers Metatheory (November 2, 2017). Columbia Law Review, Vol. 118; U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 653. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3064267 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3064267

Aziz Z. Huq (Contact Author)

University of Chicago - Law School ( email )

1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

Register to support our free research

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
103
rank
233,336
Abstract Views
318
PlumX