How Precise are Estimates of the Natural Rate of Unemployment?
58 Pages Posted: 26 Jun 1998 Last revised: 21 Dec 2022
Date Written: March 1996
Abstract
This paper investigates the precision of conventional and unconventional estimates of the natural rate of unemployment (the 'NAIRU'). The main finding is that the NAIRU is imprecisely estimated: a typical 95% confidence interval for the NAIRU in 1990 is 5.1% to 7.7%. This imprecision obtains whether the natural rate is modeled as a constant, as a slowly changing function of time, as an unobserved random walk, or as a function of various labor market fundamentals; it obtains using other series for unemployment and inflation, including additional supply shift variables in the Phillips curve, using monthly or quarterly data, and using various measures for expected inflation. This imprecision suggests caution in using the NAIRU to guide monetary policy.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root
By Graham Elliott, Thomas J. Rothenberg, ...
-
By James H. Stock and Mark W. Watson
-
The Time-Varying NAIRU and its Implications for Economic Policy
-
Evidence on Structural Instability in Macroeconomic Time Series Relations
By James H. Stock and Mark W. Watson
-
Is There a Role for Monetary Aggregates in the Conduct of Monetary Policy?
-
Confidence Intervals for the Largest Autoresgressive Root in U.S. Macroeconomic Time Series
-
What's Happened to the Phillips Curve?
By Flint Brayton, John M. Roberts, ...
-
By Victor Zarnowitz and Phillip A. Braun
-
Price Inertia and Policy Ineffectiveness in the United States, 1890-1980
-
Exchange Rate Regimes and Shifts in Inflation Persistence: Does Nothing Else Matter?