Tinker Remorse: On Threats, Boobies, Bullying, and Parodies

Posted: 8 Nov 2017

See all articles by Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

Capital University - Law School

Date Written: 2016


While students in school have free speech rights, those rights are not absolute. In a series of cases, the Court has modified the students’ rights jurisprudence in ways that do not make it clearer but, instead, more obscure and more difficult to apply. The circuit courts have tried to take account of the Court’s changing views and have come up with very different and sometimes incompatible ways to apply the doctrine. Until the United States Supreme Court offers a coherent analysis of the existing jurisprudence that offers guidance on several issues on which there is a split, lower courts will continue to offer increasingly incompatible interpretations of the jurisprudence — they will issue decisions that are increasingly at odds with each other and which, considered together, will increasingly undermine good public policy and the perception that the law treats individuals fairly and consistently.

Keywords: Political Commentary, Threats, Vulgarity, Disruption, Parody

JEL Classification: K10

Suggested Citation

Strasser, Mark, Tinker Remorse: On Threats, Boobies, Bullying, and Parodies (2016). 15 First Amendment Law Review 1-42 (2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3066445

Mark Strasser (Contact Author)

Capital University - Law School ( email )

303 E. Broad St.
Columbus, OH 43215-3200
United States
614-236-6686 (Phone)
614-236-6956 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics