Does Data Mining Add Any Value to Academic Research? Fundamental Anomalies in Multiple Hypothesis Setting

63 Pages Posted: 9 Nov 2017 Last revised: 3 Aug 2018

See all articles by Ondrej Tobek

Ondrej Tobek

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Economics

Date Written: July 1, 2018

Abstract

We study statistical significance of 93 fundamental anomalies published in academic journals in a multiple hypothesis setting. We generate a universe of 1,499 data-mined fundamental strategies in order to overcome a problem of not being able to observe strategies that were tried but not published. The multiple hypothesis tests reveal that the number of significant anomalies heavily depends on the precise specification of the tests. We show that the adjustment of standard errors on portfolio returns for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation is of first order importance and t-statistics on the portfolio returns do not have critical values of the normal distribution.

Keywords: fundamental strategies, data mining, international evidence

JEL Classification: G12, G15

Suggested Citation

Tobek, Ondrej, Does Data Mining Add Any Value to Academic Research? Fundamental Anomalies in Multiple Hypothesis Setting (July 1, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3066973 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3066973

Ondrej Tobek (Contact Author)

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Economics ( email )

Sidgwick Avenue
Cambridge, CB3 9DD
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
74
Abstract Views
367
rank
322,122
PlumX Metrics