Prediction, Persuasion, and the Jurisprudence of Behaviorism

19 Pages Posted: 10 Nov 2017

See all articles by Frank A. Pasquale

Frank A. Pasquale

Brooklyn Law School; Yale University - Yale Information Society Project

Glyn Cashwell

Vistronix

Date Written: November 8, 2017

Abstract

Machine learning experts are feeding judicial opinions to algorithms, to predict how future cases will be decided. We call the use of such predictive analytics in judicial contexts a jurisprudence of behaviorism, as it rests on a fundamentally Skinnerian model of cognition as a black boxed transformation of inputs into outputs. In this model, persuasion is passé; what matters is prediction. After describing and critiquing a recent study that has advanced this jurisprudence of behaviorism, we question the value of such research.

Keywords: Black Box Algorithms, Judicial Decisions, Predictive Analytics, Natural Language Processing, Machine Learning, Legal Realism, N-Grams, Spurious Correlations

Suggested Citation

Pasquale, Frank A. and Cashwell, Glyn, Prediction, Persuasion, and the Jurisprudence of Behaviorism (November 8, 2017). U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017-34, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3067737

Frank A. Pasquale (Contact Author)

Brooklyn Law School ( email )

250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States

Yale University - Yale Information Society Project ( email )

127 Wall Street
New Haven, CT 06511
United States

Glyn Cashwell

Vistronix ( email )

11091 Sunset Hills Rd
Suite 700
Reston, VA 20190
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
434
Abstract Views
2,755
rank
74,401
PlumX Metrics