Unduly Burdening Women’s Health: How Lower Courts are Undermining Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
Michigan Law Review, Vol. 116, No.2, 2017, Forthcoming
12 Pages Posted: 10 Nov 2017
Date Written: November 9, 2017
Abstract
Some states are already attempting to cabin the Supreme Court’s recent decision Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt in a variety of unpersuasive ways. Hellerstedt reaffirmed that women have a constitutionally protected right to decide to end a pregnancy, and that restrictions on abortion are constitutionally valid only if the restrictions do not impose an undue burden on women seeking an abortion.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Litman, Leah, Unduly Burdening Women’s Health: How Lower Courts are Undermining Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt (November 9, 2017). Michigan Law Review, Vol. 116, No.2, 2017, Forthcoming, UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2017-53, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3068427
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN