Lead User Method vs. Innovation Contest – An Empirical Comparison of Two Open Innovation Methodologies for Identifying Social Innovation for Flood Resilience in Indonesia

Technology and Innovation Management, Hamburg University of Technology, Working Paper No. 101, 2017

22 Pages Posted: 17 Nov 2017  

Moritz Goeldner

Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH)

Daniel J. Kruse

Hamburg University of Technology

Cornelius Herstatt

Technical University Hamburg-Harburg (TUHH)

Date Written: November 14, 2017

Abstract

Organizations in the humanitarian sector often face problems that are hard to solve owing to their complexity and high hidden solution knowledge. We investigate two problem-solving governance mechanisms in the case of floods in Indonesia. In our study, we compare the costs and benefits of two open innovation tools for identifying social innovation: an innovation contest and the lead user method. An innovation contest is a challenge among participants, who submit potential solutions to a problem that is posted in an open call. In contrast, the lead user method is a structured search process to identify innovators who have already developed solutions for their own needs or those of their peers. While innovation contests have seen significant attention, there is very little evidence that the lead user method is a suitable tool to identify social innovation. In our study, the contest yielded more than twice as much submissions as the lead user method (60 vs. 25). Our analysis reveals that concepts obtained by the lead user method score significantly higher in overall quality as well as regarding use value, feasibility, degree of elaboration, and social impact. The concepts’ novelty do not significantly differ between the two groups. We discuss these findings against the background of the humanitarian sector being torn between capacity overload and the need to overcome a one-size-fits-all approach. By transferring two recognized governance forms for innovation identification from the private sector to the humanitarian sector, we introduce a new path towards empowering local innovators to solve humanitarian challenges.

Keywords: Lead User method; innovation contest; problem solving; social innovation; user innovation; open innovation

Suggested Citation

Goeldner, Moritz and Kruse, Daniel J. and Herstatt, Cornelius, Lead User Method vs. Innovation Contest – An Empirical Comparison of Two Open Innovation Methodologies for Identifying Social Innovation for Flood Resilience in Indonesia (November 14, 2017). Technology and Innovation Management, Hamburg University of Technology, Working Paper No. 101, 2017. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3070877 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3070877

Moritz Goeldner (Contact Author)

Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH) ( email )

Am Schwarzenberg-Campus 4
Hamburg, DE Hamburg 21073
Germany

Daniel J. Kruse

Hamburg University of Technology ( email )

Schwarzenbergstrasse 95
Hamburg, DE Hamburg 21073
Germany

Cornelius Herstatt

Technical University Hamburg-Harburg (TUHH) ( email )

Hamburg, D-21071
Germany

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
193
rank
145,743
Abstract Views
1,072
PlumX