Choosing Not to Choose: When Politicians Choose to Delegate Powers
24 Pages Posted: 11 Apr 2002
Abstract
Elected politicians often choose to delegate competence to various agencies rather than deciding themselves. The paper deals with the apparent paradox that competence is being transferred despite the fact that politicians are assumed to maximize individual utility. The constitutional structure, which is assumed to be exogenously given, serves as the independent variable in deriving hypotheses concerning delegation behavior as the dependent variable. Two categories of delegation can be distinguished: domestic delegation - to agencies within the legislators' jurisdiction - and international delegation - to supranational or international bodies. The choice of the body to which decision-making powers are transferred has rarely been analyzed within a unified framework. The paper deals with this issue.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Economic Growth and Judicial Independence: Cross Country Evidence Using a New Set of Indicators
By Lars P. Feld and Stefan Voigt
-
Inflation Culture, Central Bank Independence and Price Stability
By Bernd Hayo
-
By Stefan Voigt
-
Attitudes Towards Inflation and the Viability of Fixed Exchange Rates: Evidence from the EMS
-
A Public Choice Case for the Administrative State
By David B. Spence and Frank B. Cross
-
Making Judges Independent - Some Proposals Regarding the Judiciary
By Lars P. Feld and Stefan Voigt
-
Economic Analysis and the Design of Constitutional Courts
By Tom Ginsburg
-
The Economic Effects of Human Rights
By Lorenz Blume and Stefan Voigt