Solitary Confinement, Rights Litigation, and the Possibility of a Prison Abolitionist Lawyering Ethic

(2017) 32(2) Canadian Journal of Law and Society 165

34 Pages Posted: 11 Dec 2017

Date Written: September 20, 2017

Abstract

This paper considers the role that litigation might play in ending the human rights crisis of solitary confinement in Canada while also examining the relationship of prisoner rights litigation to broader, anti-carceral social movements. The paper proceeds in four parts. The first section provides a brief overview of the widespread use of solitary confinement in Canada’s federal prisons and in provincial and territorial jails. Next, current litigation seeking an end to solitary confinement in the federal prisons system is located in the context of a long history of prisoner rights litigation in both the US and Canada. The third section considers the possibilities and challenges of pursuing prisoner rights litigation with broader critiques of the carceral state in mind. The paper ends with examples of anti-carceral lawyering efforts and identifies some elements of a prison abolitionist lawyering ethic.

Suggested Citation

Parkes, Debra L., Solitary Confinement, Rights Litigation, and the Possibility of a Prison Abolitionist Lawyering Ethic (September 20, 2017). (2017) 32(2) Canadian Journal of Law and Society 165, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3072723 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3072723

Debra L. Parkes (Contact Author)

Peter A. Allard School of Law ( email )

1822 East Mall
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
148
Abstract Views
718
rank
285,537
PlumX Metrics