Rebalancing: A Comprehensive Reassessment

37 Pages Posted: 27 Nov 2017

See all articles by Michael Edesess

Michael Edesess

Hong Kong University of Science & Technology (HKUST) - Department of Finance

Date Written: November 21, 2017

Abstract

Investment advisors, investment books, and investment columns almost never fail to advise investors to rebalance their portfolios. Numerous academic articles have been written about it, most of them arguing that it adds value. Yet the existence and precise nature of that value have remained a subject of intense debate. Most past articles on rebalancing have reduced the comparison of rebalancing with alternatives such as buy-and-hold to a single summary statistic, either expected return or median return. Due to the different skews in the probability distributions, however, comparing a single summary statistic does not support the overly broad conclusions that have often been reached. Comparisons that take the entire distributions into account provide better insight. Results of those comparisons are mixed as to whether rebalancing adds value. This article analyzes the arguments that have been advanced for rebalancing, identifying their points of validity and their flaws. It presents the results of original empirical research, simulations, and mathematical derivations that together identify how often and to what extent rebalancing enhances or degrades the performance of an investment portfolio.

Suggested Citation

Edesess, Michael, Rebalancing: A Comprehensive Reassessment (November 21, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3075023 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3075023

Michael Edesess (Contact Author)

Hong Kong University of Science & Technology (HKUST) - Department of Finance ( email )

Clear Water Bay, Kowloon
Hong Kong

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
119
Abstract Views
368
rank
241,573
PlumX Metrics