Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Did Obamacare Implementation Cost Clinton the 2016 Election?

46 Pages Posted: 27 Nov 2017  

Vladimir Kogan

Ohio State University (OSU) - Department of Political Science

Thomas Wood

Ohio State University (OSU)

Date Written: November 21, 2017

Abstract

We combine administrative records from the federal health care exchange with aggregate- and individual-level data on vote choice in the 2016 election. We show that personal experiences with the Affordable Care Act informed voting behavior and that these effects could have altered the election outcome in pivotal states, suggesting that Republican efforts to undermine the law's implementation paid tangible political dividends. We also offer evidence that consumers purchasing coverage through the exchange were sensitive to premium price hikes publicized shortly before the election -- despite most receiving a federal tax credit that shielded them from the increases. We attribute this to the design of the HealthCare.gov website, which reduced the salience of federal subsidies and likely made consumers needlessly sensitive to media coverage focusing on rising premiums. Placebo tests using survey responses collected before the premium information became public suggest that these relationships are indeed causal.

Keywords: 2016 Presidential Election, Obamacare, Affordable Care Act, Policy Feedback, Retrospective Voting, Health Policy

JEL Classification: I13, I18, H50, H51, H70, H77

Suggested Citation

Kogan, Vladimir and Wood, Thomas, Did Obamacare Implementation Cost Clinton the 2016 Election? (November 21, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3075406

Vladimir Kogan (Contact Author)

Ohio State University (OSU) - Department of Political Science ( email )

Columbus, OH 43210
United States

Thomas Wood

Ohio State University (OSU) ( email )

Blankenship Hall-2010
901 Woody Hayes Drive
Columbus, OH OH 43210
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
375
Rank
66,618
Abstract Views
7,908