Alcock v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (1991)

Charles Mitchell and Paul Mitchell (eds), Landmark Cases in the Law of Tort (Hart Publishing 2010) 273-309

34 Pages Posted: 28 Nov 2017

See all articles by Donal Nolan

Donal Nolan

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

Date Written: February 18, 2010

Abstract

This chapter considers the landmark decision in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310 concerning liability for psychiatric injury, or ‘nervous shock’. Alcock is the single most important English authority on liability for nervous shock, since although its implications for so-called ‘primary victims’ and rescuers may have been diluted by later case law, as far as ‘secondary victims’ are concerned, it remains the controlling decision. In this chapter, I argue that Alcock was an essentially conservative decision, rather than the reactionary one which it is often assumed to have been, and hence that it is a landmark case not so much because it represented a significant change in the law’s direction, but because it codified or systematised what had come before. I also argue that the conservatism of Alcock was likely to have been influenced, not only by the facts of the case itself, but also by the large number of other man-made disasters that occurred in the UK in the late 1980s, by developments in Australia and the United States, and by broader trends in English tort law. Finally, I critique the claim that in Alcock the House of Lords overstepped the proper limits of adjudication, and engaged in ‘judicial legislation’. My analysis begins with the development of the English law relating to nervous shock up until Alcock and continues with some important cases in Australia and the United States, before considering the wider context in which Alcock was decided. There follows a detailed analysis of the Alcock litigation itself. I conclude by making some general observations about the House of Lords’ decision.

Keywords: tort law, negligence, nervous shock, psychiatric injury, primary victims, secondary victims

Suggested Citation

Nolan, Donal, Alcock v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (1991) (February 18, 2010). Charles Mitchell and Paul Mitchell (eds), Landmark Cases in the Law of Tort (Hart Publishing 2010) 273-309, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3075853

Donal Nolan (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

St Cross Building
St Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UL
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/people/donal-nolan

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,601
Abstract Views
5,423
Rank
22,073
PlumX Metrics