Hongkong Fir Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd., the Hongkong Fir (1961)

Charles Mitchell and Paul Mitchell (eds), Landmark Cases in the Law of Contract (Hart 2008) 269-297

31 Pages Posted: 28 Nov 2017

See all articles by Donal Nolan

Donal Nolan

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

Date Written: May 30, 2008

Abstract

This chapter discusses the decision of the Court of Appeal in The Hongkong Fir, one of the most important English contract cases of the 20th century. In this analysis of the Hongkong Fir case I argue that close consideration of the case law, coupled with an appreciation of the historical background, reveals certain flaws in the current general understanding of the decision. In particular I argue, first, that the reasoning in the case was not as novel as has sometimes been suggested; secondly, that the most novel aspect of that reasoning (the suggestion that there was a third category of terms—later christened ‘innominate’ or ‘intermediate’ terms—alongside conditions and warranties) was not as central to the analysis as it is generally assumed to have been; and, thirdly, that another, very important, aspect of the reasoning in the case (the very strong connection between the rules governing discharge by frustration and discharge for breach) tends now to be overlooked.

Keywords: contract law, breach of contract, discharge, intermediate term, frustration

Suggested Citation

Nolan, Donal, Hongkong Fir Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd., the Hongkong Fir (1961) (May 30, 2008). Charles Mitchell and Paul Mitchell (eds), Landmark Cases in the Law of Contract (Hart 2008) 269-297, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3075903

Donal Nolan (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

St Cross Building
St Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UL
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/people/donal-nolan

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
455
Abstract Views
2,486
rank
77,343
PlumX Metrics