Not so Fast: How Slower Utilities Regulation Can Reduce Prices and Increase Profits

The School of Public Policy Publications, 2013

30 Pages Posted: 29 Nov 2017

See all articles by G. Kent Fellows

G. Kent Fellows

University of Calgary - The School of Public Policy

Date Written: May 20, 2013

Abstract

Energy consumers are facing cost pressures from multiple directions. Wholesale natural gas prices have been climbing substantially from their record lows. Oil prices have only recently cooled slightly after reaching nearly $100 a barrel (WTI) earlier this year. That makes it that much more important to minimize costs to wholesale consumers of energy, and ultimately, retail buyers, wherever possible. There is little room in the energy network for unnecessary costs. But in a regulated system, profits for utilities must remain healthy, too, if we expect them to stay active in the market. But the way that government agencies regulate oil and gas pipelines in Canada, and elsewhere, appears to be increasing costs beyond where they need to be in order to fairly serve both utilities and customers. By relying on traditional rate-of-return regulation models — which calculate price-rates based on the regulated firm’s cost of capital (that is, how much it costs the company to finance its operations) — regulators, including the National Energy Board and the Alberta Utilities Commission, reward firms for over-investing in their operations, rather than reducing costs. Utilities are motivated to prolong the period in which they can earn a return on their capital, since it is one of the few opportunities they have to increase profits under the widely used rateof-return regulatory model. That results in utilities keeping assets on the books — and paying for them — longer than they might otherwise need to be. The end result is a distortion of the decisions made by regulated firms and higher prices for consumers than might occur under a different regulatory model. Regulators that take a more passive role in setting the rate of return for their client industries, however, are likely to see their idleness pay off. Firms with a freer hand to do so will seek to accelerate the depreciation of capital assets, reducing costs more quickly. The result may see end-consumers pay more in the short term, but substantially less over the long term.

Suggested Citation

Fellows, G. Kent, Not so Fast: How Slower Utilities Regulation Can Reduce Prices and Increase Profits (May 20, 2013). The School of Public Policy Publications, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3077030

G. Kent Fellows (Contact Author)

University of Calgary - The School of Public Policy ( email )

Calgary, Alberta
Canada

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
4
Abstract Views
64
PlumX Metrics