Third-Party Ownership Business Models and the Operational Performance of Solar Energy Systems

Forthcoming, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management

31 Pages Posted: 30 Nov 2017 Last revised: 19 Jun 2019

See all articles by Jose Guajardo

Jose Guajardo

University of California, Berkeley

Date Written: October 1, 2017

Abstract

The non-residential solar energy market has grown rapidly in the United States. Companies considering the adoption of solar energy have an important choice: whether to purchase the system (direct ownership, or DO) or opt for an agreement with a service provider that offers third-party ownership (TPO). Although this decision is financially very important, empirical research comparing the two models from an operational perspective has been scarce. These issues are particularly relevant considering that federal and state incentives are commonly used to stimulate adoption. This paper presents an empirical analysis of the role of TPO in the operational performance of non-residential solar energy installations in California. Using a panel data estimation framework, and accounting for factors that influence TPO adoption, the analysis shows that TPO systems performed on average approximately 4% better than directly owned systems (DO) in terms of their production yield. This performance improvement is consistent with better system design under TPO, but not with better solar panel technology selection by TPO providers.

Keywords: third-party ownership, business models, operational performance, solar energy, empirical analysis

Suggested Citation

Guajardo, Jose, Third-Party Ownership Business Models and the Operational Performance of Solar Energy Systems (October 1, 2017). Forthcoming, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3078132

Jose Guajardo (Contact Author)

University of California, Berkeley ( email )

310 Barrows Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
81
Abstract Views
446
rank
303,288
PlumX Metrics