Examining the Examiners: SEC Error Detection Rates and Human Capital Allocation

59 Pages Posted: 30 Nov 2017 Last revised: 30 Jul 2019

See all articles by Matthew Kubic

Matthew Kubic

Duke University - Fuqua School of Business

Date Written: October 20, 2017

Abstract

I derive a measure of financial reporting error detection rates using information from SEC comment letter reviews. In a sample of 13,429 reviews covering 2005 to 2014, I find the SEC’s Division of Corporate Finance (DCF) identifies an error that results in a restatement in 4.6% of cases, while firms ultimately restate 13.6% of periods under SEC review. Using the ratio of errors the DCF directly identifies (616 or 4.6%) to total corrected errors (1,829 or 13.6%) to measure error detection rates (33.7%), I document a positive association between detection rates and the size of the DCF review team. This association is concentrated in the number of accountants assigned to the review team. I find an economically insignificant association between individual examiner error detection performance and economic or career incentives.

Keywords: SEC, comment letter, restatement, enforcement, error detection

Suggested Citation

Kubic, Matthew, Examining the Examiners: SEC Error Detection Rates and Human Capital Allocation (October 20, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3078689 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3078689

Matthew Kubic (Contact Author)

Duke University - Fuqua School of Business ( email )

Box 90120, Fuqua School of Business
Durham, NC 27708-0120
United States

HOME PAGE: http://sites.duke.edu/mattkubic/

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
166
Abstract Views
1,248
rank
181,029
PlumX Metrics