Judging in Marriage's Shadow

35 Pages Posted: 30 Nov 2017 Last revised: 24 Apr 2018

See all articles by Robert Leckey

Robert Leckey

McGill University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: November 28, 2017

Abstract

This paper contributes to feminist debates on cohabitation by studying judicial discourse after legal reform. It examines how Canadian judges speak about cohabitation and decide whether cohabitants qualify as “spouses” for the purposes of property sharing. Judges compare cohabitants against an ideal of companionate marriage with gendered and class overtones. A contrasting tendency is to disavow moral judgments by declaring openness to a diversity of relationships. It seems difficult to operationalize cohabitation as a relationship form distinct from marriage. Indeed, the cases undermine assertions that reform makes married couples and cohabitants equal. Efforts to “modernize” family law appear to give new life to traditional ideals of the good marriage.

Keywords: cohabitation, equality, family law, judicial discourse, marriage

JEL Classification: K19

Suggested Citation

Leckey, Robert, Judging in Marriage's Shadow (November 28, 2017). (2018) 26(1) Feminist Legal Studies 25-45. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3078793

Robert Leckey (Contact Author)

McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )

3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec
Canada
514-398-4148 (Phone)
514-398-4659 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
49
Abstract Views
353
PlumX