Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Finality and the Capital/Non-Capital Punishment Divide

Final Judgments: The Death Penalty in American Law and Culture (A. Sarat ed.), 2017; ISBN-10: 1107155487

UNC Legal Studies Research Paper

40 Pages Posted: 4 Dec 2017  

Carissa Byrne Hessick

University of North Carolina School of Law

Date Written: November 29, 2017

Abstract

This book chapter examines the role that concerns about finality have played in both capital cases and juvenile life-without-parole sentencing cases. It will describe how finality has shaped the Supreme Court’s death penalty cases, as well as the role it has played in recent juvenile life-without-parole cases. It will then offer some tentative thoughts on whether the non-capital finality concerns – specifically, the perceived need for post-sentencing assessments – should be extended to capital defendants and how post-sentencing assessments might inform the ongoing debate over the death penalty abolition in the United States.

Keywords: capital punishment, sentencing, death penalty, finality, rehabilitation, life without parole, juvenile offenders

Suggested Citation

Hessick, Carissa Byrne, Finality and the Capital/Non-Capital Punishment Divide (November 29, 2017). Final Judgments: The Death Penalty in American Law and Culture (A. Sarat ed.), 2017; ISBN-10: 1107155487; UNC Legal Studies Research Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3079883

Carissa Hessick (Contact Author)

University of North Carolina School of Law ( email )

Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
116