Secular Growth in Garrison's Model: A Comment

2017. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 354-359

7 Pages Posted: 5 Dec 2017 Last revised: 15 Feb 2020

See all articles by Nicolas Cachanosky

Nicolas Cachanosky

Metropolitan State University of Denver; American Institute for Economic Research

Date Written: November 20, 2017

Abstract

I comment on the controversy around Garrison’s secular growth, with special emphasis in Murphy’s contribution in this issue. I also argue that further research on this area should focus in formally connecting Garrison’s model with neoclassical growth theory.

Keywords: Garrison's Model, Secular Growth, Solow Model

JEL Classification: E0, O0, B53

Suggested Citation

Cachanosky, Nicolas, Secular Growth in Garrison's Model: A Comment (November 20, 2017). 2017. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 354-359, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3080507

Nicolas Cachanosky (Contact Author)

Metropolitan State University of Denver ( email )

Student Success Building
890 Auraria Pkwy #310
Denver, CO 80217
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.ncachanosky.edu

American Institute for Economic Research

PO Box 1000
Great Barrington, MA 01230
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
29
Abstract Views
390
PlumX Metrics