Secular Growth in Garrison's Model: A Comment

2017. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 354-359

7 Pages Posted: 5 Dec 2017 Last revised: 15 Feb 2020

See all articles by Nicolas Cachanosky

Nicolas Cachanosky

Metropolitan State University of Denver; American Institute for Economic Research

Date Written: November 20, 2017

Abstract

I comment on the controversy around Garrison’s secular growth, with special emphasis in Murphy’s contribution in this issue. I also argue that further research on this area should focus in formally connecting Garrison’s model with neoclassical growth theory.

Keywords: Garrison's Model, Secular Growth, Solow Model

JEL Classification: E0, O0, B53

Suggested Citation

Cachanosky, Nicolas, Secular Growth in Garrison's Model: A Comment (November 20, 2017). 2017. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 354-359. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3080507

Nicolas Cachanosky (Contact Author)

Metropolitan State University of Denver ( email )

Student Success Building
890 Auraria Pkwy #310
Denver, CO 80217
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.ncachanosky.edu

American Institute for Economic Research

PO Box 1000
Great Barrington, MA 01230
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
24
Abstract Views
314
PlumX Metrics