Zentai and the Troubles of Extradition

39 Monash University Law Review 894

U. of Adelaide Law Research Paper No. 2017-35

22 Pages Posted: 6 Dec 2017

See all articles by Matthew T. Stubbs

Matthew T. Stubbs

University of Adelaide - School of Law

Date Written: December 5, 2017

Abstract

In Minister for Home Affairs (Cth) v Zentai, the High Court held that the Treaty on Extradition between Australia and the Republic of Hungary prevented Mr Zentai’s extradition to face accusations of committing a retrospective war crimes offence. The case is, in all likelihood, the last episode in the history of Australia’s contributions to bringing to justice alleged war criminals from the Second World War. The extraordinary time and resources devoted to the ultimately abortive extradition process in Zentai raise questions about the efficiency of the procedures under the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth). Further, given the strict textual interpretation adopted by the Court, amendment to some of Australia’s extradition treaties may be required to uphold the key purpose of extradition arrangements, which is to facilitate international cooperation in the apprehension and surrender for trial of those accused of serious criminal offences.

Keywords: extradition, subsequent practice, war crimes

JEL Classification: K1

Suggested Citation

Stubbs, Matthew T., Zentai and the Troubles of Extradition (December 5, 2017). 39 Monash University Law Review 894, U. of Adelaide Law Research Paper No. 2017-35, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3083151

Matthew T. Stubbs (Contact Author)

University of Adelaide - School of Law ( email )

Ligertwood Building
Adelaide 5005, South Australia SA 5005
Australia
+61883133530 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/directory/matthew.stubbs

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
4
Abstract Views
135
PlumX Metrics