The Place of Robo-Advisors in the UK Independent Financial Advice Market. Substitute or Complement?

66 Pages Posted: 19 Dec 2017

Date Written: August 31, 2017

Abstract

Perceived high fees, low-quality digital support, apparently complex products are a few of the reasons why investors and savers become less satisfied with services provided by Independent Financial Advisers (IFAs) and look for alternatives. Robo-advice is one of the alternatives. However, robo-advisory services on their own possess several limitations, including the lack of human interface, emotional support and need for social proof. The blend of traditional and robo-advisory into a hybrid advice model could fix the problem and provide benefits to all stakeholders, from traditional IFAs and robo-advisory firms to the end users - investors and savers.

The aim of this research is to review and understand in depth the structure and the peculiarities of the current IFA industry in the UK and, through a deep analysis of the IFA industry to understand the place of robo-advisory services within it. I also seek to understand what a possible outlook of the IFA industry could be in the future. The hypotheses are formulated and tested in the empirical part of research.

Suggested Citation

Nikiforova, Tatiana, The Place of Robo-Advisors in the UK Independent Financial Advice Market. Substitute or Complement? (August 31, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3084609 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3084609

Tatiana Nikiforova (Contact Author)

University of Oxford ( email )

Oxford
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,165
Abstract Views
2,819
Rank
37,757
PlumX Metrics