Moral and Criminal Responsibility: Answering and Refusing to Answer

20 Pages Posted: 18 Dec 2017

See all articles by R. A. Duff

R. A. Duff

University of Stirling - Department of Philosophy

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: December 14, 2017

Abstract

Drawing on Gary Watson’s seminal work on responsibility, this paper focuses on what he calls accountability. It distinguishes (in s. 1), answerability from liability, and then concentrates on answerability, which operates, it argues (contra David Shoemaker), analogously in both moral and legal contexts. It discusses (in s. 2) the way in which answerability requires us to attend to the capacities of the person whom we hold responsible, not just at the time of the conduct for which he is now being held responsible, but at the time of the holding. In s. 3, it then attends to some implications of the requirement that when we hold someone answerable, we must be ready to listen to their answer. Finally, in s. 4, it tackles the issue of standing: what gives us the right to call another person to account; and what can undermine that standing — with what implications?

Keywords: Watson, Responsibility, Accountability, Answerability, Capacities, Standing

Suggested Citation

Duff, Robin Antony, Moral and Criminal Responsibility: Answering and Refusing to Answer (December 14, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3087771 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3087771

Robin Antony Duff (Contact Author)

University of Stirling - Department of Philosophy ( email )

Stirling, Scotland FK9 4LA
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
78
rank
221,504
Abstract Views
254
PlumX Metrics