Nuisance, Planning and Regulation: The Limits of Statutory Authority

Andrew Dyson, James Goudkamp and Frederick Wilmot-Smith (eds), Defences in Tort (Hart 2015) 183-206

25 Pages Posted: 20 Dec 2017  

Donal Nolan

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

Date Written: January 8, 2015

Abstract

In this chapter, I examine the defence of statutory authority in the law of private nuisance. I argue that if we let our guard down, the de facto extension of the defence could put at risk the continued vitality of private nuisance as a cause of action. Recent developments in the law of private nuisance have threatened in effect to extend the defence of statutory authority to encompass the defendant’s compliance with regulatory regimes governing his activity, and at least some instances in which planning permission has been granted for the use of land causing the alleged nuisance. I argue that there are fundamental objections to these de facto extensions of statutory authority, and that they are inconsistent with core features or aspects of that defence. The core message of the chapter is summed up by Tony Weir’s characteristically pithy remark that ‘administrators cannot authorise torts’.

Keywords: tort law, private nuisance, defences, statutory authority, planning permission, regulatory compliance

Suggested Citation

Nolan, Donal, Nuisance, Planning and Regulation: The Limits of Statutory Authority (January 8, 2015). Andrew Dyson, James Goudkamp and Frederick Wilmot-Smith (eds), Defences in Tort (Hart 2015) 183-206. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3088520

Donal Nolan (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

Worcester College
Oxford, OX1 2HB
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/people/donal-nolan

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
44
Abstract Views
138
PlumX