TPP's Coup de Grâce: How the Trademark System Prevailed as Geographical Indication System

in PARADIGM SHIFT IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW RULE-MAKING, TPP AS A NEW MODEL FOR TRADE AGREEMENTS?, Julien Chaisse, Henry Gao, and Chang-fa Lo eds. (New York: Springer, Series “Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific,” 2017) 273-291.

14 Pages Posted: 22 Dec 2017 Last revised: 2 Jan 2021

See all articles by Danny Friedmann

Danny Friedmann

Peking University School of Transnational Law; Peking University School of Transnational Law

Date Written: May 30, 2017

Abstract

In the struggle for supremacy between two diametrically opposed systems to protect Geographical Indications (GIs), the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) gives the decisive push in favour of the trademark system. This has profound implications for generic geographical names, not only for TPP members, but also for their trade partners. Appellation d’Origine Contrôlée (AOC), Lisbon Agreement, EU’s Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) regime and the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement set up sui generis registration systems in order to protect the AOs, PDOs/PGIs and GIs against confusion, dilution, deception and usurpation. These sui generis systems have a shield against becoming generic in common. The question is whether the maximalist doctrine for multilateral treaties have reached its zenith with the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement. Since this multilateral treaty allows intergovernmental organizations to become members, the EU could drastically change the significance of this sui generis system. Then again, the TPP suggests that the pendulum is swinging back for multilateral treaties towards a trademark dominated GI system that protects non-wines and spirits against confusion, dilution and deception, but not against usurpation. By demanding that TPP members be able to protect GIs via trademarks, Article 18.19 TPP gave a deathblow to any exclusive sui generis regime. Nevertheless, a fortiori, the battle for hegemony of the sui generis or trademark system will continue along the vault line of the Old and New Worlds at the level of bilateral free-trade agreements and specific GI agreements.

Keywords: geographical indications, certification trademark, collective trademark, sui generis, appellation of origin, TPP, Paris Convention, Madrid Agreement, Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement, Lisbon Agreement

JEL Classification: K10, K30, K33, K39, Q1, Q18

Suggested Citation

Friedmann, Danny, TPP's Coup de Grâce: How the Trademark System Prevailed as Geographical Indication System (May 30, 2017). in PARADIGM SHIFT IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW RULE-MAKING, TPP AS A NEW MODEL FOR TRADE AGREEMENTS?, Julien Chaisse, Henry Gao, and Chang-fa Lo eds. (New York: Springer, Series “Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific,” 2017) 273-291., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3090172

Danny Friedmann (Contact Author)

Peking University School of Transnational Law ( email )

Peking Univ. Shenzhen Campus
University Town, Xili, Nanshan District
Shenzhen, 518055
China

HOME PAGE: http://stl.pku.edu.cn/faculty-2/danny-friedmann/

Peking University School of Transnational Law ( email )

China

HOME PAGE: http://ipdragon.org

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
81
Abstract Views
453
rank
366,603
PlumX Metrics