The Hostile Audience Revisited

Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, "Emerging Threats" Series (2017)

33 Pages Posted: 2 Jan 2018  

Frederick Schauer

University of Virginia School of Law

Date Written: December 25, 2017

Abstract

This essay, commissioned by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, addresses the way in which recent events in Charlottesville and elsewhere have raised once again the First Amendment problem of the hostile audience. When speakers, protesters, and demonstrators are met with hostile and violent audience reactions, when, if ever, is it appropriate and constitutional to restrict the speakers in order to prevent or control violence? Most of the relevant Supreme Court cases are decades old, and arguably fail to address what are now perceived as genuine threats to public order and personal safety. Perhaps most significantly, little in the existing doctrinal landscape focuses on the cost question – just how much must a municipality (or university) expend in financial and human resources in order to protect the First Amendment rights of controversial, provocative, or racist speakers? Addressing this question exposes even larger questions about the costs of the First Amendment, and thus about who should bear those costs.

Suggested Citation

Schauer, Frederick, The Hostile Audience Revisited (December 25, 2017). Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, "Emerging Threats" Series (2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3093114

Frederick Schauer (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
434-924-6777 (Phone)

Register to support our free research

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
104
rank
231,745
Abstract Views
233
PlumX