Appraisal After Dell

The Corporate Contract in Changing Times: Is the Law Keeping Up? (U. Chicago Press) (2018 Forthcoming)

36 Pages Posted: 5 Jan 2018

Date Written: January 2, 2018

Abstract

This Essay examines the state of appraisal in Delaware after the Delaware Supreme Court’s decisions in DFC Global (July 2017) and Dell (December 2017). In these two cases, the Supreme Court reversed Chancery Court rulings that “fair value” exceeded the deal price. In doing so the Supreme Court strongly signaled that deal price should receive presumptive weight as long as the deal process is good. The question then becomes how good the deal process must be in order to gain deference to the deal price. In Dell, the Chancery Court found that the deal process was good enough to satisfy fiduciary duties but not good enough to warrant deference to the deal price. The Supreme Court revisited (and in some instances, mischaracterized) key facts from the record to conclude that the Chancery Court’s ruling constituted an “abuse of discretion.” This Essay concludes with implications for practitioners and courts. An earlier version of this Essay is titled Using the Deal Price for Determining "Fair Value" in Appraisal Proceedings.

Keywords: mergers & acquisitions, appraisal, Delaware, corporate law

JEL Classification: G30, G34, K22

Suggested Citation

Subramanian, Guhan, Appraisal After Dell (January 2, 2018). The Corporate Contract in Changing Times: Is the Law Keeping Up? (U. Chicago Press) (2018 Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3095164

Guhan Subramanian (Contact Author)

Harvard Business School ( email )

Soldiers Field Road
Morgan 270C
Boston, MA 02163
United States
617-495-9784 (Phone)
617-496-7379 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
370
Abstract Views
1,550
rank
79,720
PlumX Metrics