Collective Bargaining Rights and Police Misconduct: Evidence from Florida
University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 831
U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 655
Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, forthcoming
48 Pages Posted: 5 Jan 2018 Last revised: 25 Jun 2021
There are 2 versions of this paper
Collective Bargaining Rights and Police Misconduct: Evidence from Florida
Collective Bargaining and Police Misconduct: Evidence from Florida
Date Written: August 1, 2019
Abstract
We provide quasi-experimental evidence on the effects of law enforcement collective bargaining rights on violent incidents of misconduct. Our empirical strategy exploits a 2003 Florida Supreme Court decision (Williams) conferring collective bargaining rights on sheriffs’ deputies. Using a state administrative database of “moral character” violations over 1996-2015, we implement a difference-in-difference approach in which police departments (which were unaffected by Williams) serve as a control group for sheriffs’ offices. Our estimates imply that collective bargaining rights led to a substantial increase in violent incidents of misconduct among sheriffs’ offices relative to police departments. This result is robust to including only violent incidents involving officers hired before Williams, suggesting that it is due to a deterrence mechanism rather than compositional effects. In a separate event-study analysis, unionization is associated with higher levels of violent misconduct, and so appears to be a channel for the effect.
Keywords: Collective bargaining rights; Police unions; Police misconduct; Law enforcement
JEL Classification: K42; J50; J45
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation