Safety vs. Sensitivity: Possible Worlds and the Law of Evidence

43 Pages Posted: 11 Jan 2018 Last revised: 16 Mar 2018

See all articles by Michael S. Pardo

Michael S. Pardo

University of Alabama School of Law

Date Written: 2018

Abstract

This article defends the importance of epistemic safety for legal evidence. Drawing on discussions of sensitivity and safety in epistemology, the article explores how similar considerations apply to legal proof. In the legal context, sensitivity concerns whether a factual finding would be made if it were false, and safety concerns how easily a factual finding could be false. The article critiques recent claims about the importance of sensitivity for the law of evidence. In particular, this critique argues that sensitivity does not have much of an effect on the value of legal evidence and that it fails to explain legal doctrine. By contrast, safety affects the quality of legal evidence, and safety explains central features of the law of evidence, including probative value, admissibility rules, and standards of proof.

Keywords: epistemology, evidence, legal proof, safety, sensitivity, possible worlds, probative value, admissibility, standards of proof, statistical evidence, verdicts

Suggested Citation

Pardo, Michael S., Safety vs. Sensitivity: Possible Worlds and the Law of Evidence (2018). Legal Theory, Vol. 24, 2018, Forthcoming; U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3100246. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3100246

Michael S. Pardo (Contact Author)

University of Alabama School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
165
rank
177,369
Abstract Views
379
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information