Eclipse of the Public Corporation or Eclipse of the Public Markets?
Rotman School of Management Working Paper No. 3100255
Charles A. Dice Center Working Paper No. 2018-1
Fisher College of Business Working Paper No. 2018-03-01
European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) - Finance Working Paper No. 547/2018
29 Pages Posted: 17 Jan 2018 Last revised: 19 Jan 2018
There are 2 versions of this paper
Eclipse of the Public Corporation or Eclipse of the Public Markets?
Eclipse of the Public Corporation or Eclipse of the Public Markets?
Date Written: January 1, 2018
Abstract
Since reaching a peak in 1997, the number of listed firms in the U.S. has fallen in every year but one. During this same period, public firms have been net purchasers of $3.6 trillion of equity (in 2015 dollars) rather than net issuers. The propensity to be listed is lower across all firm size groups, but more so among firms with less than 5,000 employees. Relative to other countries, the U.S. now has abnormally few listed firms. Because markets have become unattractive to small firms, existing listed firms are larger and older. We argue that the importance of intangible investment has grown but that public markets are not well-suited for young, R&D-intensive companies. Since there is abundant capital available to such firms without going public, they have little incentive to do so until they reach the point in their lifecycle where they focus more on payouts than on raising capital.
Keywords: Listings, delistings, IPOs, intangible capital, private firms, public firms, private equity, payouts
JEL Classification: G18, G24, G28, G32, G35, K22, L26
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation