39 Pages Posted: 6 May 2002
This article tests beliefs about the relation between local demographics and trial outcomes. It analyzes damages awards and plaintiff trial win rates at trials in federal and state courts for torts cases, products liability cases, and employment cases. In federal court trials, we find no robust evidence that award levels correlate with population demographics in the expected directions. A persistent result is a negative relation between award levels and black population percentages. We also do not find robust evidence that local demographics help explain plaintiff win rates. We do find a significant correlation between larger black population percentages and the likelihood of a plaintiff trial win in urban job discrimination, products liability, and torts cases. State court trials yield no robust evidence that race, income, or urbanization substantially help explain award levels. Poverty rates do have marginally significant correlations with increased award levels in torts and employment cases. And plaintiff win rates do correlate positively with poverty rates in state court tort cases, but this effect does not emerge in products liability or employment cases. Overall, we find little evidence of consistent demographic effects on trial outcomes.
Keywords: juries, census, trials, damages
JEL Classification: J7, K10, K13, K41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Eisenberg, Theodore and Wells, Martin T., Trial Outcomes and Demographics: Is There A Bronx Effect?. Texas Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=310081 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.310081