Tax Benefit Complexity and Take-Up: Lessons from the Earned Income Tax Credit

49 Pages Posted: 19 Jan 2018 Last revised: 16 Sep 2018

Date Written: September 15, 2018

Abstract

Millions of low-income Americans fail to claim tax benefits for which they are eligible, possibly because the rules governing the benefits are extraordinarily complex. I consider efforts to increase tax benefit take-up in light of this complexity. A key fact is that the vast majority of tax filers today prepare their taxes with assisted preparation methods (APMs) like software or professional assistance. APMs eliminate some – but not all – of the barriers to claiming tax benefits for which one is eligible. With respect to claiming the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), I argue that most of the relevant complexity is the type that is eliminated by APMs. Consequently, efforts to increase EITC take-up should focus on inducing EITC-eligible individuals to file a tax return using an APM. In contrast, efforts aimed at increasing awareness of the credit (of the type widely employed by governments and nonprofits today) are less likely to be successful, except to the extent they themselves induce an increase in tax filing. Reforms that appear unrelated to a tax benefit may dramatically affect the benefit’s take-up by altering incentives to file a return. I develop these arguments in the context of the EITC, drawing on recent empirical work to support my claims.

Keywords: tax administration, earned income tax credit

Suggested Citation

Goldin, Jacob, Tax Benefit Complexity and Take-Up: Lessons from the Earned Income Tax Credit (September 15, 2018). Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 514. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3101160 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3101160

Jacob Goldin (Contact Author)

Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
144
rank
189,431
Abstract Views
620
PlumX