Parting Ways or Lashing Back? Withdrawals, Backlash and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

30 Pages Posted: 18 Jan 2018 Last revised: 13 Apr 2018

See all articles by Ximena Soley

Ximena Soley

Max Planck Society for the Advancement of the Sciences - Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law

Silvia Steininger

Max Planck Society for the Advancement of the Sciences - Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law

Date Written: January 17, 2018

Abstract

This paper will analyze instances and threats of withdrawal from the IACtHR in order to assess whether those cases can be qualified as backlash. Backlash often serves as an umbrella term for any form of disagreement, hence, we differentiate backlash from closely connected concepts such as contestation and resistance. In the empirical part of this paper, we examine four cases of withdrawal from the IACtHR or threats thereof, namely Trinidad and Tobago, the Dominican Republic, Peru and Venezuela. The case studies revealed that the criticism against the IACtHR is fueled by a combination of three conditions, i.e. costs of membership, domestic political system, and domestic impact of the judgments. Ultimately, the specific framework of the IACtHR allows for innovative starting points to manage state discontent, in particular the two-tiered structure, the alliance with civil society, and the presence of compliance partners within the state.

Keywords: international courts, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, backlash, withdrawal, resistance

Suggested Citation

Soley, Ximena and Steininger, Silvia, Parting Ways or Lashing Back? Withdrawals, Backlash and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (January 17, 2018). Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law (MPIL) Research Paper No. 2018-01. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3103666 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3103666

Ximena Soley

Max Planck Society for the Advancement of the Sciences - Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law ( email )

Im Neuenheimer Feld 535
69120 Heidelberg, 69120
Germany

Silvia Steininger (Contact Author)

Max Planck Society for the Advancement of the Sciences - Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law ( email )

Im Neuenheimer Feld 535
69120 Heidelberg, 69120
Germany

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
147
rank
160,642
Abstract Views
532
PlumX Metrics