The Governance of Not-for-Profit Firms
62 Pages Posted: 3 May 2002 Last revised: 18 Nov 2022
There are 2 versions of this paper
Date Written: May 2002
Abstract
Many factors including incentive-pay, powerful shareholders, and takeover threats push for-profits managers towards maximizing shareholder value. One of the most striking factors about non-profit firms is that they have no comparable governance institutions, and the only check on managers are boards that are themselves rarely responsible to anyone outside the firm. This essay discusses the implications of these weak governance institutions on non-profit behavior. A primary implication is that non-profits will often evolve into organizations that resemble workers' cooperatives. The primary check on this tendency is the need of the organizations to compete in outside markets. After presenting a model of non-profit behavior, I look at four different sectors (hospitals, museums, universities and the church). All display significant signs of capture by elite workers, but all still perform their basic missions reasonably, probably because of market competition.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Beauty is a Beast, Frog is a Prince: Assortative Matching with Nontransferabilities
By Patrick Legros and Andrew F. Newman
-
Incentives in Markets, Firms and Governments
By Daron Acemoglu, Michael Kremer, ...
-
Signaling and Screening of Workers' Motivation
By Josse Delfgaauw and Robert Dur
-
Incentives and Workers' Motivation in the Public Sector
By Josse Delfgaauw and Robert Dur
-
Incentives and Workers' Motivation in the Public Sector
By Josse Delfgaauw and Robert Dur
-
From Public Monopsony to Competitive Market: More Efficiency But Higher Prices
By Josse Delfgaauw and Robert Dur