Annexation or Conquest? The Economics of Empire Building

Department of Economics Working Paper No. 2002-15

31 Pages Posted: 27 May 2002

See all articles by Herschel I. Grossman

Herschel I. Grossman

Deceased

Juan Mendoza

SUNY at Buffalo, College of Arts & Sciences, Department of Economics

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: May 2002

Abstract

This paper develops an economic theory of empire building. This theory addresses the choice among three strategies that empire builders historically have used. We call these strategies Uncoerced Annexation, Coerced Annexation, and Attempted Conquest. The theory yields hypotheses that relate the choice among these strategies to such factors as the economic gains from imperial expansion, the relative effectiveness of imperial armies, the costs of projecting imperial military power, and liquidity constraints on financing imperial armies. This theory also yields hypotheses about the scope of imperial ambitions. The paper uses examples from the history of the Roman, Mongol, Ottoman, and Nazi German empires to illustrate the applicability of the theory.

Keywords: Annexation, Conquest, Empire Building

JEL Classification: D74, F02, N40

Suggested Citation

Grossman (deceased), Herschel I. and Mendoza, Juan J., Annexation or Conquest? The Economics of Empire Building (May 2002). Department of Economics Working Paper No. 2002-15. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=310602 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.310602

Juan J. Mendoza (Contact Author)

SUNY at Buffalo, College of Arts & Sciences, Department of Economics ( email )

415 Fronczak Hall
Buffalo, NY 14260
United States
716-645-2121 ext. 36 (Phone)
716-645-2127 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
302
Abstract Views
3,558
rank
90,374
PlumX Metrics