Contested Meanings of Inclusiveness, Accountability and Transparency in Trade Policymaking

16 Pages Posted: 30 Jan 2018

See all articles by Jeremy Malcolm

Jeremy Malcolm

Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)

Date Written: January 22, 2018

Abstract

Inclusiveness, accountability and transparency carry different meanings in the context of different public policy processes, and for different stakeholder groups engaged in those processes. In particular, civil society has had a substantial role in conceptualising these meanings in internet governance policy spaces, but a much reduced rule in their explication in trade policymaking. It will be argued that greater support for trade policymaking could arise from a project to reconcile civil society’s expectations of the inclusiveness, accountability and transparency of trade negotiations with the political realities of the trade negotiator, while at the same time enhancing negotiators’ appreciation of the metrics that civil society stakeholders will use in assessing trade negotiations, especially those that relate to the internet.

Keywords: GigaNet

Suggested Citation

Malcolm, Jeremy, Contested Meanings of Inclusiveness, Accountability and Transparency in Trade Policymaking (January 22, 2018). GigaNet: Global Internet Governance Academic Network, Annual Symposium 2017. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3107296 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3107296

Jeremy Malcolm (Contact Author)

Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) ( email )

454 Shotwell St.
San Francisco, CA 94110
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
21
Abstract Views
178
PlumX Metrics