Memory Hole or Right to Delist? Implications of the Right to Be Forgotten for Web Archiving

6 RESET Social Sciences Research on the Internet (2016)

19 Pages Posted: 5 Mar 2018

Date Written: June 1, 2017

Abstract

This article studies the possible impact of the “right to be forgotten” (RTBF) on the preservation of native digital heritage. It analyses the extent to which archival practices may be affected by the new right, and whether the web may become impossible to preserve for future generations, risking to disappear from memories and history since no version would be available in public or private archives. Collective rights to remember and to memory, free access to information and freedom of expression, seem to clash with private individuals’ right to privacy. After a presentation of core legal concepts of privacy, data protection and freedom of expression, we analyse the case of the European Union Court of Justice vs. Google concerning the right to be forgotten, and look deeper into the controversies generated by the decision. We conclude that there is no room for concern for archives and for the right to remember given the restricted application of RTBF.

Keywords: right to be forgotten, GDPR, privacy, data protection

Suggested Citation

Dulong de Rosnay, Mélanie and Guadamuz, Andres, Memory Hole or Right to Delist? Implications of the Right to Be Forgotten for Web Archiving (June 1, 2017). 6 RESET Social Sciences Research on the Internet (2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3107565

Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay

CNRS - Communication Sciences ( email )

3, rue Michel-Ange
Paris, 75794
France

Andres Guadamuz (Contact Author)

University of Sussex ( email )

Falmer
Brighton, BN1 9QN
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
87
Abstract Views
433
rank
309,935
PlumX Metrics