Discrimination and Administrative Burden in Public Service Markets: Does a Public-Private Difference Exist?

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Forthcoming, DOI: org/10.1093/jopart/muy009.

27 Pages Posted: 31 Jan 2018 Last revised: 22 Mar 2018

See all articles by Sebastian Jilke

Sebastian Jilke

Rutgers University-Newark

Wouter van Dooren

Catholic University of Leuven (KUL) - Public Management Institute

Sabine Rys

University of Antwerp

Date Written: 2018

Abstract

Public services are often provided in markets where both public and private providers operate. Irrespective of ownership status, public services ought to be accessible regardless of clients’ race, gender, ethnicity, or age. However, as theories of statistical discrimination and cream skimming suggest, market-based incentives may lead service providers to focus on non-minority clients because they perceive them as easier-to-serve and therefore less costly. This may lead to discrimination and hence jeopardizes equal access. In this study, we ask whether private, for-profit providers are more likely to discriminate on ethnic grounds compared to publicly owned providers. We implement a field experiment within the Flemish elderly care market by sending out email requests with either a Flemish or a Maghrebian name to all public and privately owned nursing homes. For overall response rates, no statistically significant differences between senders were found. However, we do find that privately owned facilities are about 20 percentage points less likely to provide information on how to enroll when the request is send from a Maghrebian name alias, and blinded coders perceive the information sent to the Maghrebian alias as less comprehensive. In publicly owned facilities, no such differences exist. We conclude that a public-private difference does exist, but that the mechanism of discrimination is subtler than expected. Rather than directly refusing to respond, nursing homes increase administrative burdens and learning costs for minority applicants.

Keywords: Discrimination, Street-Level Bureaucracy, Publicness; Field Experiment, Public Service Delivery, Marketization, Cream Skimming, Administrative Burden

JEL Classification: D01, D02, J15, H10, H41, H83

Suggested Citation

Jilke, Sebastian and van Dooren, Wouter and Rys, Sabine, Discrimination and Administrative Burden in Public Service Markets: Does a Public-Private Difference Exist? (2018). Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Forthcoming, DOI: org/10.1093/jopart/muy009.. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3107998

Sebastian Jilke (Contact Author)

Rutgers University-Newark ( email )

111 Washington Street
Center for Urban and Public Service
Newark, NJ 07102
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.sebastianjilke.net

Wouter Van Dooren

Catholic University of Leuven (KUL) - Public Management Institute ( email )

Oude Markt 13
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant
Belgium

Sabine Rys

University of Antwerp ( email )

Prinsstraat 13
Antwerp, Antwerp 2000
Belgium

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
91
rank
266,190
Abstract Views
285
PlumX Metrics