How We Got Here? Transition Failures, Their Causes, and the Populist Interest in the Constitution

9 Pages Posted: 13 Feb 2018

See all articles by Andrew Arato

Andrew Arato

New School for Social Research

Date Written: September 1, 2017

Abstract

How is it possible, that after the exhilarating start of democratic transitions in the late 1980s and 90s, today authoritarian-populist options seem to be emerging in many new, as well as old democracies? Why does populism, that in most of its historical varieties has been anti-institutional and anti-procedural, turn to constitution making and constitutional rhetorics as one of its main arenas of contestation?

The answers to these questions are related. In the following, in the form of six theses, I start with what I mean by “populism”. Next, I wish to point to the two deficits of liberal democracy that provides the context for the rise of populist politics. These deficits according to me have been intensified in many of the new democracies. I continue by stressing populism’s own deficits as the reason for turning to the constituent power. I end with a consideration of what liberal democrats can do to address the causes of the populist temptation, and deal with the likely crises of populist governments and regimes.

Keywords: populism, democracy, welfare state

JEL Classification: K

Suggested Citation

Arato, Andrew, How We Got Here? Transition Failures, Their Causes, and the Populist Interest in the Constitution (September 1, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3116219 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3116219

Andrew Arato (Contact Author)

New School for Social Research ( email )

66 West 12th Street
New York, NY 10011
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
243
Abstract Views
1,214
Rank
274,602
PlumX Metrics