Common Ownership, Competition, and Top Management Incentives
56 Pages Posted: 5 Feb 2018 Last revised: 11 Jun 2018
There are 3 versions of this paper
Common Ownership, Competition, and Top Management Incentives
Common Ownership, Competition, and Top Management Incentives
Date Written: February 2018
Abstract
When one firms strategy affects other firms value, optimal executive incentives depend on whether shareholders have interests in only one or in multiple firms. Performance-sensitive contracts induce managerial effort to reduce costs, and lower costs induce higher output. Hence, greater managerial effort can lead to lower product prices and industry profits. Therefore, steep managerial incentives can be optimal for a single firm and at the same time violate the interests of common owners of several firms in the same industry. Empirically, managerial wealth is more sensitive to performance when a firms largest shareholders do not own large stakes in competitors.
Keywords: CEO pay, Common ownership, Competition, corporate governance, management incentives
JEL Classification: D21, G30, G32, J31, J41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Florian Ederer
Yale School of Management ( email )
165 Whitney Avenue
New Haven, CT 06511
United States
HOME PAGE: http://faculty.som.yale.edu/florianederer/
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
Common Ownership, Competition, and Top Management Incentives
This is a CEPR Discussion Paper. CEPR charges a fee of $8.00 for this paper.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.
