After the Trump Era: A Constitutional Role Morality for Presidents and Members of Congress

65 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2018 Last revised: 15 Oct 2018

See all articles by Neil Siegel

Neil Siegel

Duke University School of Law

Date Written: April 9, 2018

Abstract

In the United States today, the behavior of the political branches is generally viewed as more damaging to the American constitutional system than is the behavior of the federal courts. Yet constitutional law scholarship continues to focus primarily on judges and judging. This Article suggests that such scholarship should develop for presidents and members of Congress what it has long advocated for judges: a role morality that imposes normative limits on the exercise of official discretion over and above strictly legal limits. The Article first grounds a role morality for federal elected officials in two purposes of the U.S. Constitution whose vindication requires more than compliance with legal rules: securing the American conception of democracy as collective self- governance and creating a reasonably well-functioning federal government. Given its close connection to those purposes, a role morality for presidents and members of Congress is appropriately described as constitutional, not merely political. This Article then proposes some rhetorical, procedural, and substantive components of constitutional role morality, including a commitment to consult the political opposition before taking important actions and a rebuttable presumption in favor of moderation and compromise. The Article also explains how different actors in the American constitutional system should execute their professional responsibilities if they are to make it more, rather than less, likely that such a role morality will eventually be adopted and maintained. A final part anticipates objections, including the concern that the vision offered here faces significant implementation problems.

Keywords: role morality, elected officials, constitutional law scholarship

Suggested Citation

Siegel, Neil, After the Trump Era: A Constitutional Role Morality for Presidents and Members of Congress (April 9, 2018). Georgetown Law Journal; Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Series Paper No. 2018-17. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3119856 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3119856

Neil Siegel (Contact Author)

Duke University School of Law ( email )

210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
295
rank
95,903
Abstract Views
1,049
PlumX