Powerful Friends: EPSA, Hughes, and Cooperative Federalism for State Renewable Energy Policy

48 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2018 Last revised: 21 Jun 2018

See all articles by Joe Margolies

Joe Margolies

Columbia Law Review; Columbia University, Law School, Students

Date Written: January 19, 2017

Abstract

Until recently, the Supreme Court interpreted the Federal Power Act (FPA) to draw an impermeable boundary between the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Contract (FERC) and those of state public utility commissions. But the Court's recent decisions in FERC v. Electric Power Supply Association (EPSA) and Hughes v. Talen Energy Marketing, LLC appear to relax the formalistic test traditionally used to resolve that boundary, upholding a "program of cooperative federalism" and creating a zone of concurrent jurisdiction.

Both cases vindicate federal authority against claims for state jurisdiction, but by acknowledging the degree to which the traditional domains of FERC and the states interweave and by endorsing cooperative federalism under the FPA, their combination also suggests an expanded zone of influence for the states. Hughes even ends with a direct invitation to the states to continue innovating. This invitation likely strikes a chord with states like New York and California, which have recently adopted among the most aggressive renewable energy mandates in the United States.

This Note examines, through the lens of state policymakers in New York and California, the extent to which the new jurisprudence will help states to reach their ambitious renewable energy goals in the absence of a comprehensive federal policy. Achieving these goals will likely require the use of programs that straddle the traditional federal–state jurisdictional divide. This Note analyzes four such policy tools: net metering, feed-in tariffs, mandatory bilateral contracting, and limitations on out-of-state power. It concludes that EPSA and Hughes give states that plan to enact these policies significant legal ground to stand on. But each of these tools will still require FERC's support to be optimally successful. Without it, achieving states' ambitious goals may remain just out of reach.

Keywords: Federal Power Act, Federalism, FERC, Electricity Regulation, State Policy, New York, California, Renewable Energy

Suggested Citation

Margolies, Joe, Powerful Friends: EPSA, Hughes, and Cooperative Federalism for State Renewable Energy Policy (January 19, 2017). Columbia Law Review, Vol. 118, pp. 1425–72, 2018. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3120737

Joe Margolies (Contact Author)

Columbia Law Review ( email )

435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10027
United States

Columbia University, Law School, Students ( email )

435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
131
PlumX Metrics