Transparency's Ideological Drift
47 Pages Posted: 12 Feb 2018 Last revised: 2 Mar 2018
Date Written: February 9, 2018
In the formative periods of American "open government" law, the idea of transparency was linked with progressive politics. Advocates of transparency understood themselves to be promoting values such as bureaucratic rationality, social justice, and trust in public institutions. Transparency was meant to make government stronger and more egalitarian. In the twenty-first century, transparency is doing different work. Although a wide range of actors appeal to transparency in a wide range of contexts, the dominant strain in the policy discourse emphasizes its capacity to check administrative abuse, enhance private choice, and reduce other forms of regulation. Transparency is meant to make government smaller and less egregious.
This Article traces transparency's drift in the United States from a progressive toward a more libertarian (or neoliberal) orientation and offers some reflections on the causes and consequences of that drift—and on the possibility of a reversal. Many factors have played a part, including corporate capture of freedom of information laws, the exponential growth in national security secrecy, the emergence of the digital age and associated technologies of disclosure, the desire to facilitate international trade and investment, and the ascendance of market-based theories of regulation. Perhaps the most fundamental driver of this ideological drift, however, is the most easily overlooked: the diminishing marginal returns to governmental transparency. As public institutions became subject to more and more policies of formal openness and accountability, demands for transparency became more and more threatening to the functioning and legitimacy of those institutions and, consequently, to progressive political agendas.
Keywords: transparency, publicity, secrecy, open records, open meetings, open data, campaign finance, First Amendment, consumer protection, administrative law, legislative process, governance, regulation, law and politics, progressivism, neoliberalism
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation