Taxation Under Uncertainty - Problems of Dynamic Programming and Contingent Claims Analysis in Real Option Theory
29 Pages Posted: 16 May 2002
Date Written: April 2002
Abstract
This article deals with the integration of taxes into real option-based investment models under risk neutrality and risk aversion. It compares two possible approaches -- dynamic programming and contingent claims analysis -- to analyze their effects on the optimal investment rules before and after taxes. It can be shown that despite their different assumptions, dynamic programming and contingent claims analysis yield identical investment thresholds under risk neutrality. In contrast, under risk aversion, there are severe problems in determining an adequate risk-adjusted discount rate. The application of contingent claims analysis is restricted to cases with a dividend rate unaffected by risk. Therefore, only dynamic programming permits an explicit investment threshold without taxation. After taxes, both approaches fail to reach general solutions. Nevertheless, using a sufficient condition, it is possible to derive neutral tax systems under risk aversion as is demonstrated by using dynamic programming.
JEL Classification: H25, H21
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Value of Waiting to Invest
By Robert L. Mcdonald and Daniel Siegel
-
Irreversible Investment, Capacity Choice, and the Value of the Firm
-
Time to Build, Option Value, and Investment Decisions
By Saman Majd and Robert S. Pindyck
-
By Gene M. Grossman and Carl Shapiro
-
The Learning Curve and Optimal Production Under Uncertainty
By Saman Majd and Robert S. Pindyck
-
Tax Asymmetries and Corporate Income Tax Reform
By Saman Majd and Stewart C. Myers